|

Same Day Multiple Prescriptions
Why
is Our Government Pursuing a War on Doctors?
Free
Electronic Newsletter
|
 |
By David B. Brushwood, R.Ph., J.D.
We all make mistakes. We know we make mistakes. There's a wonderful
phrase, "The Fog of War." What the Fog of War means is that war
is so complex it's beyond the ability of the human mind to comprehend
all the variables. Our judgment, our understanding, are not adequate. And we
kill people unnecessarily.
Robert S. McNamara, Secretary of Defense, 1961-1968.
Ron Paul, M.D., a Republican United States Congressman from Texas, recently
declared on his website that "The War on Drugs is a War on Doctors." Dr.
Paul concludes that by applying federal statutes intended for drug dealers, "prosecutors
are waging a senseless war on doctors." The victims of this war, says
Dr. Paul, are not only doctors but also their untreated or under treated patients
in pain.
This conclusion is not news to anyone who has been keeping track of drug
enforcement activities over the past several years. It is certainly not news
to Dr. Frank Fisher, Pharmacist Stephen Miller, and Miller's wife Madeline
Miller. All three were charged with five counts of murder in alleged deaths
resulting from their prescribing and dispensing of opioid analgesics to pain
patients. All three have been exonerated. It is not news to over 100 other
doctors and pharmacists who have been charged with crimes for providing opioid
analgesics to pain patients. It is not news to chronic pain patients who are
living and dying in agony because doctors and pharmacists are afraid to help
them. It is not news to California Republican State Senator Sam Aanstad, a
dentist who has introduced legislation that would significantly curtail the
ability of prosecutors to charge doctors with crimes for prescribing pain medications.
It is not news to the news media, who have finally recognized that the real
story is the war on doctors and not the diversion of opioids. Reporter Jen
McCaffrey, of the Roanoke Times covered the trial of Dr. Cecil Knox, who was
acquitted of most charges but still faces trial in a few remaining counts.
She says that the joke among doctors in Roanoke is "write a prescription,
go to jail." This so-called "joke" is not a bit funny. It
is too true to be funny.
Make no mistake. There is a war on doctors. There are tens of thousands of
innocent victims of this war. The war must be stopped. Dr. Ron Paul's
congressional colleagues should listen to him and act quickly.
Why is the war on doctors happening? Why is it happening now? Who is responsible
for this tragic injustice? What factors have brought us to this intolerable
situation from which an exit strategy must immediately be found?
Having studied the war on doctors for the past year, I believe there are
at least seven separate reasons for this war to happen and to happen now. I
base this conclusion on my study of documents from criminal cases against doctors
and pharmacists, and on public comments by both health care professionals and
drug enforcement authorities. These are the seven reasons:
- The Pain Management Movement. Well intentioned advocacy groups have championed
the pain patient's right to relief of suffering. Doctors have responded
by increasing their prescribing of opioids to treat pain. But standards
for prescribing are unclear, especially for patients who are at risk of aberrant
medication behaviors, drug abuse, or addiction. Guidelines for prescribing
have been interpreted as standards, and standards are used as a checklist
of "gotchas" by
law enforcement. No high volume prescriber can practice without occasionally
bending a rule because their patients are all individuals with unique needs.
The guidelines/standards/checklists are useless in clinical practice, but
they provide a clear roadmap for the prosecution of a doctor for unlawful
practice.
- The Rise of the Pain Management Specialist. Although there is disagreement
over who should be able to use the title "Pain Management Specialist," it
is evident that a small cadre of physicians have carved out for themselves
a new specialty in the treatment of chronic pain. Rightfully proud of themselves
and their achievements, some of these experts wrongly criticize their generalist
colleagues who treat pain because there are not enough specialists to do
this difficult job. Eager to accept hundreds of dollars per hour reviewing
generalist's
records, some specialists criticize the care provided by generalists and
conclude that because it was not the best quality care possible, it was
criminal drug
diversion.
- The Pharmacist as Informant. For decades pharmacists have been required
to distinguish legitimate prescriptions from forgeries. In the past ten
years, pharmacists have also been asked to evaluate the appropriateness of
a clearly
legal prescription, through a process known as "Drug Use Review." Many
pharmacists do this job well and they improve the quality of patients'
lives while protecting the integrity of the nation's drug supply. Some
pharmacists,
egged on by drug enforcement authorities, have misunderstood their role
as health care professionals and have become the enemy of physicians and
patients,
reporting any out-of-the ordinary prescribing to the police (without studying
the issue or contacting the prescriber), then basking in the camaraderie
they enjoy with law enforcement (until they are arrested for improper dispensing).
- Criminality in Health Care. A tiny few bad actors have tarnished the reputation
of health care professions. An English community physician has admitted
to euthanizing over 200 elderly patients. A New Jersey nurse has admitted
the
same with about 40 hospitalized patients. A Kansas City pharmacist deliberately
diluted chemotherapy to increase his profits. Of course, there is the widely
publicized account of Jack Kevorkian and his in-your-face challenges to
law enforcement, shamelessly daring them to prosecute him as he publicly
killed
one patient after another. These stories lead some prosecutors to believe
that local doctors may be psychopathic Unabombers, gleefully poisoning the
community
with illicit drugs. Compassionate care is easily confused with massive
drug diversion when investigators lose objectivity and find only what they
have
been taught to find.
- Post 9-11 Security. These are threatening times. The government has promised
to protect the public from evil doers. But how can the government protect
the public from terrorists if it can't even provide protection from drug
diversion? The failed War on Drugs needs a success story and doctors are
available as safe targets. Unlike drug lords, doctors don't shoot back, they
naively
think the legal system is consistently fair, and they don't know how
to find the best criminal lawyers. Doctors are sitting ducks. They are
being sacrificed to cover up massive failure by drug control authorities.
Prosecutions
of doctors are used to assure the public that the country is safe.
- Misled Media. Reporters have published stories critical of high opioid
prescribers, suggesting that irresponsible prescribing is the cause of
drug diversion. These stories are based on information obtained from sources
that
support the war on doctors. The "facts" of these stores become
the basis of public opinion and of new legislation that restricts opioid
prescribing or penalizes those willing to prescribe. The truth is that
prescribing is only
one of many channels through which drug diversion occurs. It is probably
only a small part of the problem. Employee theft, armed robbery, burglary,
truck
hijacking, importation from other countries, and Internet sales are responsible
for a large amount of diverted pharmaceuticals. Shutting down doctors won't
solve this problem.
- Rising Drug Costs. To understand why the war on doctors is occurring,
one must follow the money. Taxes are currently viewed as a "burden" by
most lawmakers, who want to provide "relief" from this burden.
Lower taxes have reduced or flattened the budgets of state-managed Medicaid
programs. There isn't enough money to pay for the expensive drugs that
poor people need. High prescribers of any expensive drug risk criticism
and must overcome administrative barriers due to their prescribing habits.
High
prescribers of expensive opioid analgesics are labeled as drug traffickers
and they are put out of business. It is a way to balance the budget. This
problem will only get worse when the poorly designed and under funded Medicare
prescription
drug program begins.
- Robert McNamara advises: "Empathize with your adversary or risk the
kind of miscalculation, misperception, and misjudgment that, among Great Powers,
can lead to catastrophic war." The government's war on doctors
lacks empathy. Those who pursue it should follow McNamara's advice. They
should put themselves in the skin of doctors who treat chronic pain and
look through these eyes at patients who suffer. They will see a disheartened,
poor,
cynical, out-of-work lot. They will also see tremendous opportunities to
transform lives by providing safe and effective medications. Only then
will they understand
the thoughts that lie behind the decisions and actions of doctors who treat
chronic pain. The war on doctors cannot be won because it is an unjust
war. Too many people experience chronic pain themselves or know and love
others
who do. If it continues, this war will eventually be lost, but not without
unnecessary suffering and death. The war on doctors must be stopped now.
|
|